College Football Lines on Over 130 Teams

It's a 3-0 NBA Playoff Sunday for Kelso Sturgeon! The Wizards (+4½) get the outright stunner on the road against the Bulls, 102-93 for a 50-Unit winner! Mavericks (+9½) hung tough against the Spurs and got the cover in their 90-85 loss, while the Blazers/Rockets shootout went way over 214½ (242)! Kelso also wins his two big games on the diamond: Personal Best clients walked away with a 50-Unit winner last night with the Red Sox (-170) over the Orioles, 6-5, and Chairman's Club bettors got the money with the Reds (-130) over the Cubs, 8-2!
2/3/2014 - Advanced Handicapping2/1/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/30/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/24/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/14/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/7/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/6/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/3/2014 - Advanced Handicapping1/2/2014 - Advanced Handicapping12/20/2013 - Advanced Handicapping12/13/2013 - Advanced Handicapping12/12/2013 - Advanced Handicapping12/6/2013 - Advanced Handicapping12/3/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/26/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/22/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/21/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/18/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/15/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/11/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/8/2013 - Advanced Handicapping11/7/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/31/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/24/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/18/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/15/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/11/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/10/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/7/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/4/2013 - Advanced Handicapping10/3/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/30/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/27/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/26/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/23/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/20/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/18/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/16/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/13/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/11/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/9/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/6/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/4/2013 - Advanced Handicapping9/2/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/30/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/28/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/26/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/21/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/19/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/16/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/14/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/12/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/9/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/8/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/5/2013 - Advanced Handicapping8/2/2013 - Advanced Handicapping2/2/2013 - Advanced Handicapping1/31/2013 - Advanced Handicapping1/25/2013 - Advanced Handicapping1/12/2013 - Advanced Handicapping1/11/2013 - Advanced Handicapping1/5/2013 - Advanced Handicapping12/28/2012 - Advanced Handicapping12/7/2012 - Advanced Handicapping11/30/2012 - Advanced Handicapping11/16/2012 - Advanced Handicapping11/9/2012 - Advanced Handicapping11/3/2012 - Advanced Handicapping11/1/2012 - Advanced Handicapping10/25/2012 - Advanced Handicapping10/19/2012 - Advanced Handicapping10/13/2012 - Advanced Handicapping10/12/2012 - Advanced Handicapping10/5/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/29/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/28/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/22/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/21/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/13/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/7/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/7/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/5/2012 - Advanced Handicapping9/1/2012 - Advanced Handicapping8/29/2012 - Advanced Handicapping4/20/2012 - Advanced Handicapping4/17/2012 - Advanced Handicapping3/30/2012 - Advanced Handicapping3/16/2012 - Advanced Handicapping3/13/2012 - Advanced Handicapping3/10/2012 - Advanced Handicapping3/9/2012 - Advanced Handicapping2/18/2012 - Advanced Handicapping2/17/2012 - Advanced Handicapping2/10/2012 - Advanced Handicapping2/3/2012 - Advanced Handicapping1/27/2012 - Advanced Handicapping1/20/2012 - Advanced Handicapping1/13/2012 - Advanced Handicapping1/6/2012 - Advanced Handicapping1/5/2012 - Advanced Handicapping12/22/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/18/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/17/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/15/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/11/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/9/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/7/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/4/2011 - Advanced Handicapping12/2/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/30/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/25/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/23/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/20/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/18/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/16/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/13/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/12/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/6/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/5/2011 - Advanced Handicapping11/4/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/31/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/30/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/29/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/27/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/23/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/21/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/20/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/19/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/16/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/15/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/14/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/11/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/9/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/8/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/7/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/6/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/2/2011 - Advanced Handicapping10/1/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/30/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/28/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/25/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/23/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/22/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/21/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/16/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/15/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/12/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/9/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/8/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/6/2011 - Advanced Handicapping9/2/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/31/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/29/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/26/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/25/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/24/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/22/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/19/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/18/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/17/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/16/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/12/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/11/2011 - Advanced Handicapping8/9/2011 - Advanced Handicapping7/3/2011 - Advanced Handicapping7/1/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/26/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/24/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/19/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/17/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/12/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/11/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/5/2011 - Advanced Handicapping6/3/2011 - Advanced Handicapping5/28/2011 - Advanced Handicapping5/27/2011 - Advanced Handicapping5/22/2011 - Handicapping 1015/21/2011 - Handicapping 1015/20/2011 - Handicapping 1015/15/2011 - Handicapping 1015/14/2011 - Handicapping 1015/13/2011 - Handicapping 1015/8/2011 - Handicapping 1015/7/2011 - Handicapping 1015/6/2011 - Handicapping 1015/1/2011 - Handicapping 1014/30/2011 - Handicapping 1014/29/2011 - Handicapping 1014/24/2011 - Handicapping 1014/23/2011 - Handicapping 1014/22/2011 - Handicapping 1014/17/2011 - Handicapping 1014/16/2011 - Handicapping 1014/15/2011 - Handicapping 1014/11/2011 - Handicapping 1014/10/2011 - Handicapping 1014/9/2011 - Handicapping 1014/8/2011 - Handicapping 1014/3/2011 - Handicapping 1014/2/2011 - Handicapping 1014/1/2011 - Handicapping 1013/27/2011 - Handicapping 1013/26/2011 - Handicapping 1013/25/2011 - Handicapping 1013/20/2011 - Handicapping 1013/19/2011 - Handicapping 1013/18/2011 - Handicapping 1013/13/2011 - Handicapping 1013/12/2011 - Handicapping 1013/11/2011 - Handicapping 1013/6/2011 - Handicapping 1013/5/2011 - Handicapping 1013/4/2011 - Handicapping 1012/27/2011 - Handicapping 1012/26/2011 - Handicapping 1012/25/2011 - Handicapping 1012/18/2011 - Handicapping 1012/14/2011 - Handicapping 1012/13/2011 - Handicapping 1012/12/2011 - Handicapping 1012/6/2011 - Handicapping 1012/5/2011 - Handicapping 1012/4/2011 - Handicapping 1011/30/2011 - Handicapping 1011/29/2011 - Handicapping 1011/28/2011 - Handicapping 1011/23/2011 - Handicapping 1011/21/2011 - Handicapping 1011/20/2011 - Handicapping 1011/15/2011 - Handicapping 1011/14/2011 - Handicapping 1011/8/2011 - Handicapping 1011/7/2011 - Handicapping 1011/6/2011 - Handicapping 1011/2/2011 - Handicapping 101 - NFL12/31/2010 - Handicapping 10112/30/2010 - Handicapping 10112/26/2010 - Handicapping 101 - NFL12/24/2010 - Handicapping 10112/23/2010 - Handicapping 10112/18/2010 - Handicapping 101 - NFL12/17/2010 - Handicapping 10112/16/2010 - Handicapping 10112/13/2010 - Handicapping 101 - Bowls12/12/2010 - Handicapping 101 - NFL12/10/2010 - Handicapping 10112/9/2010 - Handicapping 101 - NBA12/5/2010 - Handicapping 101 - NFL12/3/2010 - Handicapping 10112/2/2010 - Handicapping 10111/28/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10111/26/2010 - Handicapping 10111/24/2010 - Handicapping 10111/21/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10111/19/2010 - Handicapping 10111/18/2010 - Handicapping 10111/14/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10111/12/2010 - Handicapping 10111/11/2010 - Handicapping 10111/7/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10111/5/2010 - Handicapping 10111/4/2010 - Handicapping 10110/30/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10110/29/2010 - Handicapping 10110/28/2010 - Handicapping 10110/22/2010 - Handicapping 10110/21/2010 - Handicapping 10110/16/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10110/15/2010 - Handicapping 10110/14/2010 - Handicapping 10110/8/2010 - NFL Handicapping 10110/7/2010 - Handicapping 10110/6/2010 - Handicapping 10110/1/2010 - Handicapping 1019/30/2010 - Handicapping 1019/22/2010 - Handicapping 101

 733 PACERS
 734 HAWKS
4/24/2014 7:00 PM(et)
-2
+2
186 
-2
+2
186 
-2
+2
186 
-2
+2
186½ 
-2
+2
186 
-2
+2
186 
 735 THUNDER
 736 GRIZZLIES
4/24/2014 8:00 PM(et)
-1
+1
190 
-1½
+1½
190 
-1½
+1½
190 
-1½
+1½
189½ 
-1½
+1½
190 
-1½
+1½
190 
 737 CLIPPERS
 738 WARRIORS
4/24/2014 10:30 PM(et)
-1
+1
214 
-1½
+1½
215 
-1½
+1½
215 
-1½
+1½
214½ 
-1½
+1½
215 
-1½
+1½
215 
 739 RAPTORS
 740 NETS
4/25/2014 7:00 PM(et)
+4
-4
191 
+5
-5
191 
 
+5
-5
191½ 
+5
-5
191 
+5
-5
191 
 741 BULLS
 742 WIZARDS
4/25/2014 8:00 PM(et)
+2½
-2½
181 
+2½
-2½
182 
 
+3
-3
181½ 
+3
-3
182 
+2½
-2½
182 
 901 REDS
 902 PIRATES
4/24/2014 12:35 PM(et)
off
off 
 
 
 
 
 
 903 CARDINALS
 904 METS
4/24/2014 1:10 PM(et)
-120
+120
7o 
 
 
 
 
 
 905 DIAMONDBACKS
 906 CUBS
4/24/2014 2:20 PM(et)
+120
-120
off 
 
 
 
 
 
 907 PADRES
 908 NATIONALS
4/24/2014 7:05 PM(et)
+160
-160
7½p 
 
 
 
 
 
 909 PHILLIES
 910 DODGERS
4/24/2014 10:10 PM(et)
+150
-150
7½u 
 
 
 
 
 
 911 ROYALS
 912 INDIANS
4/24/2014 12:05 PM(et)
+130
-130
8½p 
 
 
 
 
 
 913 WHITESOX
 914 TIGERS
4/24/2014 1:08 PM(et)
+200
-200
8½p 
 
 
 
 
 
 915 TWINS
 916 RAYS
4/24/2014 1:10 PM(et)
+150
-150
8½p 
 
 
 
 
 
 917 ORIOLES
 918 BLUEJAYS
4/24/2014 7:07 PM(et)
+120
-120
9p 
 
 
 
 
 
 919 YANKEES
 920 REDSOX
4/24/2014 7:10 PM(et)
-110
+110
9u 
 
 
 
 
 
 921 ATHLETICS
 922 ASTROS
4/24/2014 8:10 PM(et)
-160
+160
7½o 
 
 
 
 
 

No National Football League games scheduled.

No College FootballI-A games scheduled.

No College Basketball games scheduled.

OpeningCurrent Lines around Las Vegas
Click Here to get Your Free Football Forecast Newsletter

With well over 130 college teams in NCAA Division 1 Football, even a small thing happening at one of those schools can impact college football lines, sometimes in a big way. Kelso's college football news keeps you abreast of everything that's happening in NCAA Division 1 football and in every other sports and division for that matter.

Whether it's a new head coach or a retiring offensive coach / defensive coach. Or a key player on suspension for an infraction or a even a car accident. You need to be among the first to know... You want to get in before the college football lines change as a result... If you're the last to know, you definitely pay the price. KelsoSportsHandicapping.com keeps you a step ahead.

Enroll for a free membership today! And don't forget to sign up for our free picks.

Irish try their luck against Stanford

(Sports Network) - In what appears to be an major mismatch, the 12th-ranked Notre Dame Fighting Irish and Stanford Cardinal will battle this weekend. Nothing has gone right for Stanford thus far, as it has lost all five of its games to date. Four of the defeats have come by 26 or more points, including a 31-0 thrashing at UCLA last weekend. Only once in five games has the Cardinal scored more than 10 points, and the club has failed to hold a single opponent under 30 points. As for Notre Dame, it figured to have its hands full last weekend with a Purdue squad that entered South Bend undefeated. The Irish won that contest by a 35-21 final to move to 4-1, and their schedule the rest of the way is extremely favorable. In fact, there is a good chance that the club could run the table leading up to the regular- season finale against USC. If that happens, and USC continues to play well, that contest could have BCS implications. Most important for Charlie Weis and his club at this point is taking care of business against a huge underdog this weekend. Notre Dame owns a 14-6 advantage in the all-time series with Stanford, including four straight triumphs over the Cardinal. Last season, the favored Fighting Irish held on for a 38-31 shootout victory over Stanford.

Aside from a 34-point outburst in a narrow loss to San Jose State earlier this season, Stanford has been anemic offensively. The Cardinal is averaging 12.6 ppg and 289.4 total ypg. The ground attack has been non-existent, accounting for 87.2 ypg and 2.6 ypc. Of the eight touchdowns generated by the offense, only two have come on the ground. Trent Edwards has started all five games under center, and he has completed 60.8 percent of his passes for 959 yards with six touchdowns and six interceptions. The lack of a proven performer on the outside has been a major factor in the team's struggles. The offense seemingly hit rock bottom in the shutout loss to UCLA last week, posting meager totals of 11 first downs and 166 total yards. The Cardinal turned the ball over five times, including three interceptions by Edwards. A 4-of-13 effort on third down conversion attempts and seven sacks surrendered contributed to the embarrassing showing as well.

Opponents are racking up 37.4 ppg and 458.8 total ypg against Stanford, which has looked completely helpless defensively during certain stretches. The club ranked 117th out of 119 Division I-A teams in total defense, and the Cardinal is the worst club in the nation at stopping the run. Opponents are bullying their way for 282.8 rushing ypg and 5.8 ypc against Stanford, which has surrendered 16 touchdowns on the ground. The pass defense has been far superior, but the fact is that there is no reason for Stanford's foes to put the ball in the air. Last week, the Cardinal defense was consistently put into bad situations by the seemingly endless flow of turnovers by Edwards and the offense. Stanford did come up with three takeaways of its own, but the only number that really mattered on the night was zero, the number of points scored by Walt Harris' team.

Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn came into this season with more hype than any player nationally, and while he has had some shaky moments thus far, the stats speak volumes. Quinn, a legitimate Heisman candidate, has connected on 61.7 percent of his passes for 1,402 yards with 13 touchdowns and four interceptions. He benefits from having some of the nation's premier pass catchers in the fold. Rhema McKnight leads the way with 32 grabs for 433 yards and six touchdowns, while tailback Darius Walker also has 32 catches for 213 yards and a score. As for Jeff Samardzija, the school's two-sport star, he has 27 catches for 319 yards and four touchdowns. On the ground, Walker has posted 373 yards and two scores to help Notre Dame average 30.2 ppg. Against Purdue last week, Quinn threw a pair of touchdown passes, both to McKnight, and finished with 316 yards through the air. McKnight had 10 grabs for 120 yards, overshadowing the fact that Samardzija was held in check. Walker ran for 146 yards and a touchdown on 31 carries and caught nine passes for 73 yards, his best performance of the year by far.

Opponents are scoring 26.4 ppg while posting 372.0 total ypg against a Notre Dame defense that is as inconsistent as it is talented. The unit endured a great deal of criticism after the Irish were crushed at home by Michigan a few weeks back. The defense was dominated in the first half by Michigan State the very next week, and major improvement is needed if this team is to run the table and reach a BCS bowl. Notre Dame allowed 490 yards to Purdue, including 398 yards through the air. Once again, the defense failed to impress in front of a capacity home crowd. The Irish had no sacks or interceptions, and if not for the efforts of Quinn and the offense, the game could have gone the other way.

Notre Dame certainly has its doubters, especially after the Michigan and Michigan State games. Still, the Irish are the smart pick this weekend, as Stanford will be no match for Quinn and company.

Sports Network Predicted Outcome: Notre Dame 41, Stanford 17

10/4/2006 12:21:51 PM